I don't use Manchester as much as you guys do, but looking at it from the outside, you’ve both completely exposed the gap between the shiny marketing brochure that we saw initially at the start of this project and the actual reality on the ground.
The point
@marni1971 makes about Terminal 1 closing "by name only" is a perfect example. From what I understand, they've 'closed' T1, but Ryanair passengers still have to trek through the old T1 entrance and security just to walk all the way back into Terminal 3? If the billion-pound new T2 was actually built with the right capacity, surely they wouldn't need to keep these Frankenstein, patchwork layouts alive just to handle the traffic. It sounds like they've basically built a giant shopping mall with security lanes attached, rather than a properly integrated airport terminal. Didn't a couple of piers get shelved?
And
@KARFA is spot on calling the facility as "world-class" when the BA domestic arrivals setup is actively worse than a terminal built in 1993 is just bizarre. It feels like classic modern value-engineering. Spend all the budget on high-margin duty-free areas and premium retail strips to trap passengers, while using cheap finishes on the walls and floors that look tatty after a few heavy summer rushes?
If the landside access and car parks are a bottleneck before you even step inside, it doesn't matter how fast the security queue moves. It really sounds like they've just shifted the old, famous bottlenecks out onto the approach roads and the tarmac although the new ANPR charges don't help either!