There are lots of people posting in the sub-forums on this. Lots of varying opinions as to why some airports perform better than others.
Some people believe airport layouts are responsible for the way passenger view their performance, while others belive old terminals with low ceilings severely impacts how their airport performs.
My view is that small airports are often perceived to be better because transit times through smaller terminal facilities are generally quicker. Small pick-up and drop-off areas with no-fuss parking close to the terminal is usually available from a small terminal. Naturally a small terminal is less busy because it has less flights.
The downside is facilities are often limited, staffing can be sparse and the choice of flights can often be few and far between.
On the opposite side of the spectrum large airports can be seen as stressful and often too busy. The distance between the terminal and boarding gates and the gates and arrival facilities is often substantial.
On the plus side, large airports generally have access to significantly more choice of destinations and different airlines. Large airports generally have multiple retail choices you wouldn't find at a smaller airport. You would generally find more transport options at a larger airport with rail links and national motorway links more likely.
What are your views on this?
Can an airport get too big where the benefits of a busy airport become outwayed by the negatives of having a large facility?
Do you always use the same airport and would you change your departure point just because of your experience?
#WhichAirport #RateYourAirport