Search results

  1. W

    Future Infrastructure Developments

    A week from now we will know the outcome. Fingers and everything else crossed.
  2. W

    Future Infrastructure Developments

    I see our Labour 'friend' Naz Shah has joined the "object for the hell of it brigade". Pathetic, it really defies belief. My opinion of this party was desperately low before the application. It has now plunged to new depths
  3. W

    Future Infrastructure Developments

    Interesting to read some of the S106(developers) obligations.
  4. W

    Future Infrastructure Developments

    A reasonably high quality publication by normal YEP standards. https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/politics/why-planners-recommended-leeds-bradford-airport-expansion-should-go-ahead-3123982
  5. W

    Future Infrastructure Developments

    https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/politics/why-planners-recommended-leeds-bradford-airport-expansion-should-go-ahead-3123982
  6. W

    Leeds Bradford - General Thread

    Whoever presents must stress that this is a MODERNISATION application and not an EXPANSION application. Anyone rejecting this application is effectively supporting a far less green terminal facility!
  7. W

    Leeds Bradford - General Thread

    I agree. I think it could be potentially valuable. Anyone volunteering?
  8. W

    Leeds Bradford - General Thread

    LCC had better not let us down. I really do hope we do not have to go down the appeal route.
  9. W

    Leeds Bradford - General Thread

    I'm assuming this refers to a decision rather than just continued consideration??
  10. W

    Leeds Bradford - General Thread

    Dear Sir/Madam Application 20/02559/FU/NW For Leeds And Bradford Airport Whitehouse Lane Yeadon Proposal Adjustments to the existing "airside" apron including demolition of existing passenger pier and ancillary accommodation, earthworks and site remodelling at the existing eastern parcel of the...
  11. W

    Leeds Bradford - General Thread

    Have received the attached from LCC confirming consideration date of the 11Feb
  12. W

    Leeds Bradford - General Thread

    Are we any nearer to knowing when a decision date will be known?
  13. W

    LBA Support Group Initiative

    I personally believe that the 5000 comments are not going to be a massively influential factor in their decision. There are more important factors at play. LCC panel members have already approved expansion to 7m pax pa. No rational individual would/should oppose a more environmentally friendly...
  14. W

    LBA Support Group Initiative

    I have previously said that the fact that only 5000 commented suggests the majority of the catchment is not sufficiently aggrieved to complain. I trust LCC will recognise this fact??
  15. W

    LBA Support Group Initiative

    I don't agree. I think it shows the British for what they are; apathetic and reserved.
  16. W

    LBA Support Group Initiative

    Latest signature total; 1616
  17. W

    LBA Support Group Initiative

    Should the worst case scenario happen, it will be interesting to see whether the new CEO will progress the already approved terminal extension. My personal opinion is that some progress is better than no progress.
  18. W

    Leeds Bradford - General Thread

    Well said LY. They are a one trick pony and choose to ignore the huge benefits (including environmental) the approval of the terminal and subsequent parkway station will undoubtedly begin. They are blinkered and self centered individuals. There is currently huge suppressed demand for air travel...
  19. W

    LBA Support Group Initiative

    Don't forget the CURRENT closing date for comments on the LCC portal expires on the 4 Feb. A few more days to drum up support comments ! Has the support petition been submitted to LCC, does anyone know?
Back
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker.